DONPED03
|
» Citation URL: http://vegbank.org/cite/urn:lsid:vegbank.org/vegbranch:observation:2428-{21A344E9-B4DE-4FB2-BEE3-BB72EA6C5025}
» Citing info |
Plot ID Fields: | |
Author Plot Code ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
DONPED03
|
Author Observation Code ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
DONPED03
|
Original Data Location ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, California Dept of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA
|
Location Fields: |
MAP:
Google
| Yahoo
| TopoZone
| MapQuest
|
Confidentiality Status ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
exact location
|
Latitude ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
37.7020738438061
º
|
Longitude ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
-120.393098504371
º
|
Author Location ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Don Pedro Reservoir, Turlock Irrigation District
|
Location Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
South Don Pedro Reservoir, Tuolumne County: A moderately dense, multi-aged stand of Ceanothus cuneatus with emergent Quercus douglasii on a NE facing slope just above high water line of Don Pedro Reservoir. Claytonia perfoliata understory under Ceanothus cuneatus, and in between shrubs is a tall herb cover of exotic grasses with native forbs underneath. No grazing in this area.
|
State or Province ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
California
|
Country ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
United States
|
Named Places |
|
Layout Fields: | |
Shape ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Plotless
|
Permanence ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
not permanent
|
Environment Fields: | |
Stand Size ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
small
|
Elevation ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
258
m
|
Slope Aspect ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
60
º
|
Slope Gradient ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
9
º
|
Topographic Position ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Midslope
|
Rock Type ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
slate
|
Landscape Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
upland
|
Percent Rock / Gravel ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0.4
%
|
Percent Litter ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
60
%
|
Percent Bare Soil ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
37
%
|
Percent Water ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0
%
|
Percent Other ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
3
%
|
Name Other ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
BasalStemArea
|
Methods Fields: | |
Observation Start Date ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
25-Apr-2006
|
Project ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills
|
Cover Method ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Percentage (%)
|
Stratum Method ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
CNPS/CDFW RA v. 2005
|
Cover Dispersion ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Entire
|
Overall Taxon Cover Values are Automatically Calculated? ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
no
|
Plot Quality Fields: | |
Plot Validation Level ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
(2) classification plot: sufficient for inclusion in a classification revision
|
Overall Plot Vegetation Fields: | |
Shrub Height ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
1.5
m
|
Field Height ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0.25
m
|
Shrub Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
22
%
|
Field Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
29
%
|
Dominant Stratum ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Shrub
|
Misc Fields: | |
--no data-- |
|
|