BLMAMA10
|
» Citation URL: http://vegbank.org/cite/urn:lsid:vegbank.org/vegbranch:observation:2459-{C4BE16F9-F7C7-45BB-A33B-0895709E8873}
» Citing info |
Plot ID Fields: | |
Author Plot Code ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
BLMAMA10
|
Author Observation Code ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
BLMAMA10
|
Original Data Location ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, California Dept of Fish and Wildlife, Sacramento, CA
|
Location Fields: |
MAP:
Google
| Yahoo
| TopoZone
| MapQuest
|
Confidentiality Status ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
exact location
|
Latitude ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
38.4626850936984
º
|
Longitude ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
-120.735100838503
º
|
Author Location ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
BLM parcel, Amador County
|
Location Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Open Arctostaphylos viscida stand on a very gravely/cobbly metamorphic ridge. There is virtually no herbaceous layer and very few other shrub species in the stand. There are signs of not-so-recent fire. There are some interesting plants here including Mimulus viscidus, Hypericum concinnum and Dendromecon. The stand grades into a chamise stand downslope.
|
State or Province ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
California
|
Country ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
United States
|
Named Places |
|
Layout Fields: | |
Shape ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Plotless
|
Permanence ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
not permanent
|
Environment Fields: | |
Stand Size ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
large
|
Elevation ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
578
m
|
Slope Aspect ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
(n/a, too irregular to determine)
º
|
Slope Gradient ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
3
º
|
Topographic Position ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
High slope
|
Rock Type ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
metamorphic, unspecified
|
Landscape Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
upland
|
Percent Rock / Gravel ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
93
%
|
Percent Litter ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
1
%
|
Percent Bare Soil ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
5
%
|
Percent Water ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0
%
|
Percent Other ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
1
%
|
Name Other ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
BasalStemArea
|
Methods Fields: | |
Observation Start Date ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
31-May-2006
|
Project ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Northern Sierra Nevada Foothills
|
Cover Method ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Percentage (%)
|
Stratum Method ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
CNPS/CDFW RA v. 2005
|
Cover Dispersion ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Entire
|
Overall Taxon Cover Values are Automatically Calculated? ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
no
|
Plot Quality Fields: | |
Plot Validation Level ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
(2) classification plot: sufficient for inclusion in a classification revision
|
Overall Plot Vegetation Fields: | |
Shrub Height ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
3.5
m
|
Field Height ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0.25
m
|
Shrub Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
30
%
|
Field Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0.2
%
|
Dominant Stratum ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Shrub
|
Misc Fields: | |
--no data-- |
|
|