WRAA.025
|
» Citation URL: http://vegbank.org/cite/urn:lsid:vegtwig.vegbank.org:observation:7077-{36059B0D-0F29-4C3C-8620-A4891FF64EDB}
» Citing info |
Plot ID Fields: | |
Author Plot Code ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
WRAA.025
|
Author Observation Code ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
WRAA.025
|
Original Data Location ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
California Dept. of Fish and Wildlife, Vegetation Classification and Mapping Program, Sacramento, CA
|
Location Fields: |
MAP:
Google
| Yahoo
| TopoZone
| MapQuest
|
Confidentiality Status ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
exact location
|
Latitude ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
33.7176264726197
º
|
Longitude ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
-117.242163226931
º
|
Author Location ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Kabian Park Property
|
Location Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Similar to WP 1. Eriogonum fasciculatum consistent throughout but Artemisia californica & Salvia apiana occur in lower slope & gradually fade out as go up slope where they are replaced by Encelia farinosa. Salvia apiana sticks to more mesic drainages. Artemisia californica occurs through-out but thins out up slope. Gabbro?
|
State or Province ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
California
|
Country ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
United States
|
Named Places |
|
Layout Fields: | |
Shape ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Plotless
|
Permanence ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
not permanent
|
Environment Fields: | |
Stand Size ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
extensive
|
Elevation ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
501
m
|
Slope Aspect ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
162
º
|
Slope Gradient ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
10
º
|
Topographic Position ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Lower to Upper 1/3 of slope
|
Surficial Deposits ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Igneous (type unknown)
|
Rock Type ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Igneous (type unknown)
|
Landscape Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Upland; other vegetation in polygon: Annual herb
|
Percent Rock / Gravel ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
40
%
|
Percent Litter ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
10
%
|
Percent Bare Soil ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
45
%
|
Methods Fields: | |
Observation Start Date ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
01-Jul-2003
± exact
|
Date Accuracy ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
exact
|
Project ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Western Riverside County Vegetation
|
Cover Method ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Percentage (%)
|
Stratum Method ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
CA Native Plant Society (CNPS)
|
Cover Dispersion ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
Entire
|
Overall Taxon Cover Values are Automatically Calculated? ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
no
|
Plot Quality Fields: | |
Plot Validation Level ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
(1) occurrence plot: sufficient for determining type occurrence
|
Overall Plot Vegetation Fields: | |
Field Height ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0.25
m
|
Tree Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
0
%
|
Shrub Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
34
%
|
Field Cover ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
25
%
|
Misc Fields: | |
Observation Narrative ![?](http://vegbank.org/vegbank/images/question.gif) |
original plot ID: ROMO.004/422/BPU 5256-316, Eriogonum fasciculatum vegetation; Vegetation type confidence: High, Eriogonum fasciculatum being consistent, but associates or codominants shifting gradually makes it difficult to assess.
|
|
|