Links to the taxonInterpretation for which several plantConcepts are grouped to form an irregular taxon. The plantConcept referenced here is one member of the group.
Indicates the degree of fit with the plant concept being assigned. Values derive from Gopal, S., and Woodcock, C. (1994), Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing 60(2):181-188.
closed List of Values:
Value
Description
Sorting
Absolutely wrong
(Absolutely doesn't fit) This answer is absolutely unacceptable. Unambiguously incorrect.
1
Understandable but wrong
(Doesn't fit but is close) Not a good answer. There is something about the plot that makes the answer understandable, but there is clearly a better answer. This answer would pose a problem for users. Incorrect.
2
Reasonable or acceptable answer
(Possibly fits) Maybe not the best possible answer but it is acceptable; this answer does not pose a problem to the user. Correct.
3
Good answer
(Fits reasonably well) Good match with the concept. Unambiguously correct.
4
Absolutely correct
(Fits well) No doubt about the match. Perfect fit.
Indicates the degree of confidence of the interpreter(s) in the interpretation made. This can reflect the level of familiarity with the classification or the sufficiency of information about the plot (e.g., High, Moderate, Low).
closed List of Values:
Value
Description
Sorting
High
The party making the taxon interpretation has a high confidence in the accuracy of this interpretation. A party can have high confidence that a plot has a fit of "absolutely wrong" for a particular community.
1
Medium
The party making the taxon interpretation has a medium amount of confidence in the accuracy of this interpretation.
2
Low
The party making the taxon interpretation has a low confidence in the accuracy of this interpretation.